Antiquarian Anabaptist

Apologetics from an Anabaptist perspective

My Introduction to Bible Prophecy

One Sunday in the fall of 1971, it was announced to the congregation of the Mennonite Church in Carman, Manitoba that bishop D.D. Klassen would be leading a Bible study on prophecy over the winter months.  I was a new Christian and of course I wanted to learn more about the Bible. Thus, each Wednesday evening through the winter months, Chris and I with our baby girl made the 25 km trip from our home in Sperling to  Carman to take it in.

Bishop Klassen began by telling us how Jesus the Messiah had come to establish a literal earthly kingdom of God, but the Jewish people had rejected Him as their king.  This had caused a postponement in the divine plan for Israel, a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks of Daniel’s prophecy.  The church was just an interim measure until Jesus the Messiah would return to set up His kingdom.

Before that could happen, the Christians would need to be taken out of the way by secret event called the rapture.  Then would come the long delayed 70th week and the Great Tribulation.  This would all be precipitated by the appearance of the Antichrist, a leader of all the powers of wickedness in this world who would set up a one world government.   Coming from such a well-respected, older leader, I drank it all in and accepted it as undisputed Bible truth and a trustworthy background to events that were then taking place in the Middle East.

Being a voracious reader, I began buying books on prophecy. I read John F. Walvoord, Dwight Pentecost, Lewis Sperry Chafer and many others. It surprised me a little to find differences between these writers in how they applied the prophecies to present and future events. One of Chafer’s books had been written just before the Second World War and confidently identified Benito Mussolini as the Antichrist. I certainly wondered about that. What disturbed me a little more was Chafer’s statement that the call to repentance was only for the Jews, because they had rejected Jesus as their king. Gentiles only had to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ in order to be saved, no repentance needed.

I remembered that my father had always listened to Ernest C. Manning on Canada’s National Back to the Bible Broadcast on Sunday mornings, so I began tuning in to that, too. Mr. Manning taught much the same doctrine as the books that I had read, except that he saw Russia and the communist menace everywhere in the prophetic Scriptures.

I bought a Scofield Reference Bible and followed all the notes that interpreted what the Bible really meant.  I drank it all in, though I remember wondering about some of his interpretations of the parables of Jesus that seemed to turn the meanings upside down.

A couple of years later, we were attending a Mennonite Brethren church in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan. This was at the time that The Late, Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsey hit the market. Our pastor seized upon this as the ideal material for a winter Bible study. So once again we studied the gap in Daniel’s 70 weeks, the postponement of the kingdom and the whole dispensational doctrine. When it was all over, the pastor told me privately that he didn’t believe that doctrine, but he had thought it was a good means to get people interested in studying the Bible.

What? He didn’t believe it! How could that be? Wasn’t this the only possible meaning of the prophetic Scriptures? How could I have confidence in a pastor who didn’t believe what was clearly taught in the Bible?

Or was it? A niggling little doubt began to gnaw at my certitude. But I was so emotionally invested in this doctrine that I felt that my whole faith would fall to pieces if I let go of dispensationalism.

Then I met Christians who believed all that the Bible taught and found that they did not see dispensationalism anywhere in the Bible.


One response to “My Introduction to Bible Prophecy

  1. DCorpus October 10, 2012 at 02:07

    My brother,

    I enjoyed coming across your post on bible prophecy. In my earlier walk with God, I was always taught growing up the dispensational view of the end times, Israel, and that there are 7 dispensational periods or eras of time. I grew up a pastors kid, and was very familiar with the scriptures. Eventually, as I grew up I began teaching youth about the fundamental doctrines of Christianity and the Bible. One of those teachings that I taught when I was younger was prophecy and the end times, and how Israel was God’s chosen people forever.

    But as I began to read the scriptures over an over again, I began to see many passages in a different way than I had previously understood them prior. Over time, I eventually changed my views on the end times and my understanding where Israel stands in terms of special status. Now that I’ve changed my views from dispensationalism to non-dispensationlism, I receive some interesting treatment from other christians who have always known dispensationalism, and for it to be the correct teaching. In fact, I am part of a couples bible study with a group and we decided as a group to study the book of Revelation. One of the brothers in the group is what I would consider to be a dispensationalist and is passionate about his beliefs.

    I encourage anyone to keep an open mind about the scriptures on any topic and to at least hear other viewpoints. Thanks brother.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: